Skip to main content

Why privatize?

This letter ran in the Chicago Tribune on Nov. 23, 2009, in response to the Nov. 16 article, "Leasing water system could be a risky move for Chicago."

The most important question to ask about privatizing public assets is, “Why?”

Yes, public-private partnerships have potential to reduce traffic congestion or promote water conservation more efficiently than the public sector can alone. However, to protect public interests, a privatization agreement must ensure strong public oversight, reasonable profits, and infrastructure reinvestment. Without these benefits, privatization makes little sense and just increases costs for consumers.

Illinois law requires private utilities to charge for the full cost of their services; public utilities are exempt.  Thus, private utility rates are sometimes higher, but they reflect what the water truly costs – encouraging people to be more efficient, and generating revenues to maintain treatment and delivery.  If rates are artificially low, other tax revenues have to be diverted to pay for water service.  It comes down to pay a little more now, pay much more later, or don’t pay – and suffer the wasted water, energy, and money of deteriorating infrastructure.

The right answer, then, is not the one that balances the budget in the short run, but the one that best manages our water -- for current and future generations.

MarySue Barrett
President
Metropolitan Planning Council

| Share

Comments

  1. 1. John A. Ostenburg from Chief of Staff, Chicago Teachers Union on December 20, 2009

    Mary Sue Barrett's comments about privatization of public assets is totally on target. However, I would recommend that the same standards be applied to the privatization of our public schools. Not only are private operators of public schools in Chicago posing the risks outlined in Ms. Barrett's letter, they also are doing so with tax dollar support. If ever there was a need for the "strong public oversight" that she refers to, it is in regard to the charter and contract school operators with whom the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) is engaged. Valuable public resources -- our public schools -- have been handed over to private operators with only a minimal amount of public oversight, strong or otherwise. Legislation passed by the General Assembly last year improves this situation somewhat, not nowhere as much as is needed. I urge the MPC to join efforts of the Chicago Teachers Union and others to make sure private operators of our public schools are held accountable both for the tax dollars they receive and for the education they are providing to our children.

  2. 2. Kathreen from LOODROwRr on July 3, 2013

    One or two to rmeember, that is.

Post a comment

Won't be displayed
(Optional)

Type the characters shown above:

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Metropolitan Planning Council 140 S. Dearborn St.
Suite 1400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
P 312 922 5616 F 312 922 5619 info@metroplanning.org
Helping create competitive, equitable, and sustainable communities

For 80 years, the Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) has made the Chicago region a better place to live and work by partnering with businesses, communities and governments to address the area’s toughest planning and development challenges. MPC works to solve today's urgent problems while consistently thinking ahead to prepare the region for the needs of tomorrow. Read more about our work »

Donate »