Skip to main content

Talking Transit: Atlanta votes no on solving traffic congestion, What’s next?

Commuters suffer in Atlanta traffic congestion.

Did you know?  Though Atlantans voted down the penny tax for transportation, the Atlanta BeltLine rail project will move forward.

Get In the Loop on all the latest local, national, and international transit headlines. >>

The Atlanta region is notorious for its traffic gridlock and suburban sprawl. The region’s average commuter spends 127 minutes on the road every day and an additional $924 a year simply because they’re idling in traffic. Last week Atlanta residents had a chance to do something about their transportation problems with a vote on a 10-year transportation special-purpose, local-option sales tax, or T-SPLOST. The one-cent sales tax would have paid for more than $8 billion worth of transit and highway projects, returning $34 billion back in gross regional product and supporting 200,000 jobs. Regrettably, voters said no.

What will Atlanta miss out on? A “yes” vote would have built 157 regional transportation projects, including 29 miles of new rail and improvements at highway chokepoints. These investments would have increased transit options, connected workers to jobs, attracted new economic development, improved the environment, and saved people time and money. New rail and bus capital projects would have increased transit trips by 40 percent overall, with 700 percent more workers able to reach their jobs by rail or bus in some parts of the region.

Instead, absent some other plan to manage Atlanta’s future growth, traffic gridlock is sure to get worse as the region is expected to gain 3 million people by 2040. What’s worse, Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) riders will most likely face fare hikes or service cuts in a system that already ranks last in connecting transit with jobs. With no new revenues in sight, it is doubtful Atlanta will be able to leverage new federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act loans (TIFIA), which instead will go to other regions.

One take away from the vote is that Atlanta is a much-divided region. While T-SPLOST was an admirable attempt at regionalism – projects were agreed to by county commissioners and mayors from all 10 counties, with input from residents – it was voted down 63 to 37 percent along suburban and urban lines. Voters in Atlanta’s urban core strongly supported T-SPLOST, while it was defeated in the suburbs by people reluctant to support projects outside of their community. That’s the wrong approach in a region with sprawling suburbs; transportation issues do not follow municipal borders and can be more efficiently and effectively dealt with on a regional basis.

One upshot of the T-SPLOST planning process is lessons learned on harnessing technology to engage the public in planning and policy decisions. The TransFormAtl smartphone app, downloaded by more than 8,000 people, allowed voters to easily access information about all 157 projects displayed on an interactive map. The app provided detailed information on the types of projects (transit, road, bike or pedestrian), location, financing, and scheduled completion. Civic and business proponents of the sales tax used the technology to reach voters more inclined to use a smartphone than attend a public meeting.

In other good news, the region’s biggest redevelopment yet, the Atlanta BeltLine, will move forward. The BeltLine includes a 22-mile loop of rail transit along former freight rail lines, through 45 neighborhoods surrounding Atlanta’s urban core, with anticipated daily ridership of 73,000. The BeltLine didn’t depend on T-SPLOST for funding; it is reliant on innovative financing, using $1.7 billion in value capture to fund the $2.2 billion project. Perhaps the T-SPLOST vote is another indication that innovative financing tools are the future of transportation funding.

Absent new revenues, 70 percent of the Atlanta region’s transportation funding will be spent to simply maintain the existing system over the next 30 years – leaving little to expand the network and alleviate congestion. Making matters worse the region must now pay a 30 percent match if they want state transportation funds, instead of the 10 percent it would have had to match if the sales tax had passed.  Atlanta cannot hold another vote on the measure for two more years, giving officials the unfortunate opportunity to show voters why investments in one part of the region would benefit the whole – and how Atlantans actually pay more by doing nothing.

Get In the Loop on all the latest local, national, and international transit headlines. >>

| Share

Comments

  1. 1. Jesse from WUDrDoVYMjjp on October 4, 2012

    Where to start. There are lots of things Metro COULD do, but lilkey wont. Part of the reason for this is that Metro's primary mission is NOT transit it is economic development.But for starters, Metro could try running a transit system, not a commuter system. Schedules and timetables are geared for the average worker during the week, not service outside of work times. While there is service on off-hours, it is limited. Metro and its buses are geared for the lowest common denominator of traveler those that must use it. There is absolutely nothing being done to attract those that could CHOOSE to use it. Buses go, primarily, where lower income riders are forget trying to get around in the county (or, for that matter, the 270 loop) by bus. While it is not a bad thing that the bus serves lower income areas, if that is the ONLY place buses go, people that have the ability to choose will go elsewhere. The bus system also takes TIME (and has some really whacky connections another thing that puts off potential riders) and for those who could choose to take Metro, time is money. When you have time (say, like going to a sporting event), its fine because you know the bus will take you there and you know the bus will take you back (in other words, it will actually meet a schedule) but when you have to be somewhere (like work, or to pick up children, a doctor's appointment, whatever) taking the bus is difficult, particularly when they are late. Most of the buses I have ridden (full disclosure: I have a monthly pass and use it regularly) are chronically late by 4 to 12 minutes. Again, time is money and if I am going to be chronically late because of Metro, I'll find another way to get there. This means making connections is difficult (like, getting off a train and watching your bus leave when the next one isnt for another half hour), and in the winter who wants to wait that half hour outside in the cold for the next bus? In several instances this past month I have also seen buses going WAY over the speed limit at times. Why? Their drivers were about to be off, and they wanted to finish their run and get back to the garage. Additionally, particularly at the North Hanley station, I have seen buses purposefully put up their Out of Service sign just so the driver doesn't have to let folks on before his/her time regardless of the number of riders waiting or the temperature outside. The buses also do not run late enough. Again schedules are based around the commuter, not someone who wants to take public transit. Most nightlife in the St. Louis area shuts down between 1:30am and 3:00am. Don't even think about getting a night bus because there aren't any I realize there may be financial reasons (among others) for this, but it goes back to catering to commuters who have to use the system, and not riders that might choose to. There is little to no advertising in the media, and what advertising there is seems to be geared towards the 99 downtown trolley . Buses tend to run when and where it is convenient for Metro to run them, not necessarily where folks (those that can choose, that is) need or want to go. At times, it is actually easier to take Amtrak from Kirkwood into downtown at night than it is to catch a bus either because of lack of service, or because I would need to make two connections or better. Then you have all the time and effort spent in promoting a trolley which is NOT a trolley. It makes St. Louis look like it isn't interested in real transit. I realize it is intended to be a branded service, but as someone not from here originally, sorry all you've done is encourage me NOT to ride it. Its a downtown BUS, not a downtown trolley. I have ranted here before about inadequate signage, so I'll just say that our bus stop signs are out of date and horrid. If you don't do your research ahead of time, you'd never be able to ride the bus in St. Louis because the signs that do exist nine times out of 10 are wrong because they are years out of date. Along the same lines, have you seen where some of the bus stops are? On the shoulder of busy roads, or places where there is little to no pedestrian access. Particularly in bad weather, how exactly am I supposed to safely get to a bus stop when I have several YARDS of deep snow and ice to traipse through? In many cases, there isn't sidewalk there to begin with. There is the chronic problem of continually being hit up for money for bus/train fare. If it were every now and again, it would be one thing but it isn't. That doesn't sit well with potential riders that could choose to ride. Finally, there is the general disorganization of some of Metro's stations (particularly Civic Center and Central West End). Unless you know where you're going, forget trying to figure out which bus is going to the loop in front of the Sheraton or going to stop at the shelters just north.Wow, that's quite the rant. Didn't intend it, but you did ask.

Post a comment

Won't be displayed
(Optional)

Type the characters shown above:

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Metropolitan Planning Council 140 S. Dearborn St.
Suite 1400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
P 312 922 5616 F 312 922 5619 info@metroplanning.org
Helping create competitive, equitable, and sustainable communities

Since 1934, the Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) has been dedicated to shaping a more sustainable and prosperous greater Chicago region. As an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, MPC serves communities and residents by developing, promoting and implementing solutions for sound regional growth.
Read more about our work »

Donate »