Skip to main content

The Connector Logo

Spongebob Squarepants offers a lesson in transit reliability

A few weekends ago, I was lazily browsing some Saturday morning cartoons, and caught an episode of Spongebob Squarepants that demonstrated very colorfully the effects of unreliable transit service. In this episode, Spongebob and his trusty sidekick Patrick go to a theme park and, on their way home, they decide to take the bus. Given Spongebob’s silly nature, he gets himself kicked off of the bus and is dropped off in an unknown location. As he waits at a desolate, scary, poorly lit bus stop, he starts to get hungry. But, the vending machine isn’t conveniently located next to the bus stop; it’s across the street. When he races across the street to try and get a snack, he misses several buses by a hair.

It’s a pretty funny episode, especially for a transportation-loving gal like myself. If you don’t believe me, watch this short segment.

Spongebob may be just a cartoon, but this clip actually can teach us a lot. It’s important to think about the people who use transit and provide them with the resources, amenities, and predictability that make it attractive, remove the fear factor, and ultimately attract new riders. If Spongebob’s bus service had Bus Tracker like the CTA does, he could have figured out when the next bus was coming and timed his snack attack appropriately. Had a map been available or a bus shelter located near his stop, he wouldn’t have been so confused and worried.

These little things make a big difference to riders’ experiences. Transit gets a bad reputation when three buses come at the same time, stations are leaky, or signs are unclear. If we want to encourage people to take alternative modes of transportation rather than driving solo in their car, we have to keep in mind how important it is to provide quality service that not only gets people where they need to go, but does so in a way that isn’t scary or inconvenient – and maybe, just maybe, is even a little fun.

| Share

Comments

  1. 1. Remie from WTOMOOwJIpa on February 28, 2012

    mode of tisoapnrtatron . No car commuter (as my wife now is as she now drives downtown with her carpool) enjoys the prospect of losing a method of tisoapnrtatron at the expense of something that (most likely) would not benefit them. Loss of Metropass parking, loss of lanes for bicycles, loss of lanes for Transit-only use serves only to inflame the car driver against public tisoapnrtatron. Hey, suburbs need public transit too, but it would be better if it was served as an option rather than ultimatum. Nobody likes ultimatums.That being said, I applaud York Region Transit for undertaking this transit initiative with Viva. Once the ridership of Viva rises to a more palatable level with better frequencies and service, only then would I not mind losing a few lanes to public tisoapnrtatron corridors. That way, one minimizes the disruption to car drivers who have no other choice but to rely on the car to get where they need to go.One other thing: I don't know if any one of you noticed, but from my end at the Conservative spectrum, it appears that the suburbs seem to be winning out on Transit projects as of late. The Conservative party does appreciate their suburban voters, that's for sure.Steve: I think it's a question of the point of view on BRT Lite . Where the TTC now has very frequent service and may, given the money, overlay an express service, there is no road space, generally, and the main saving will be by skipping some stops. I am thinking of the 190 series of routes like the STC Rocket. Calling them BRT Lite is like calling the Scarborough ICTS line LRT . It's stretching a name to fit something that it really isn't because Express Bus just isn't sexy enough any more. I agree with the idea of giving people better and better service as the idea of using transit catches on, but at some point, the political will must be found to dedicate road space to transit for its own use or further improvements in transit speed and capacity won't be easy to achieve.

Post a comment

Won't be displayed
(Optional)

Type the characters shown above:

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

About The Connector

The Connector is MPC's blog, written primarily by MPC staff members, with occasional guest posts from volunteers and partners. 

Subscribe 


Contribute to The Connector


Twitter MPC on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter »


Blogs MPC Loves


Latest popular keywords

Browse all keywords »


Browse by date

J F M A M J J A S O N D
2009 5 7 16 21
2010 13 20 29 21 17 24 19 21 20 12 19 9
2011 20 16 11 16 12 9 13 18 12 16 8 11
2012 16 18 14 11 7 22 26 19 15 16 15 9
2013 19 15 15 13 11
Metropolitan Planning Council 140 S. Dearborn St.
Suite 1400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
P 312 922 5616 F 312 922 5619 info@metroplanning.org
Helping create competitive, equitable, and sustainable communities

Since 1934, the Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) has been dedicated to shaping a more sustainable and prosperous greater Chicago region. As an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, MPC serves communities and residents by developing, promoting and implementing solutions for sound regional growth.
Read more about our work »

Donate »